PWSID TX1750004
CITY OF FROST
Community water system based in Frost, TX
Service area on file with EPA: Navarro County. EPA's recorded service area can be incomplete for regional authorities. The cities and counties above are what the utility has filed with EPA; the utility may serve additional areas.
- Population served
- 882
- Source
- Surface water
- Status
- Active
At a glance
2 issues above the federal safety limit
-
Active violation
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
EPA records an open, unresolved violation against this system for Lead and Copper Rule Revisions.
EPA status: Unaddressed · See details below
-
Active violation
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
EPA records an open, unresolved violation against this system for Lead and Copper Rule Revisions.
EPA status: Unaddressed · See details below
-
CDC's My Water's Fluoride listing does not report this system as fluoridating its drinking water.
Per CDC My Water's Fluoride · See details below
Risk classification follows EPA's published values for safe drinking water, with caution and concern bands reviewed by a clinician. Past resolved violations do not influence this card. See methodology.
Lead service line inventory
No inventory data on file
We do not yet have this utility's published Lead Service Line Inventory on file. The EPA Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI) required every community water system to publish one by October 16, 2024 and to identify and replace any lead lines within 10 years. How lead enters drinking water.
Phase 1 coverage focuses on the largest NC utilities. Smaller systems will be added; in the meantime, ask your utility for their inventory or check their Consumer Confidence Report.
Lead and copper test results
The most recent measurement per contaminant from EPA's Lead and Copper Rule sampling.
Why only lead and copper, and not arsenic, nitrate, or others?
EPA's bulk SDWIS download is the only nationwide per-system sample data they publish, and it only includes the Lead and Copper Rule table. Values for other regulated contaminants (TTHMs, nitrate, arsenic, etc.) appear on this page only when they trigger a violation. For the full per-system contaminant suite, see the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report (link further down the page).
| Contaminant | Most recent | Date | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB90 | 0 mg/L | December 31, 2023 | Below regulatory thresholds |
Data from EPA SDWIS (Lead and Copper Rule sample table) , last refreshed May 24, 2026.
Fluoride
Per CDC My Water's Fluoride
CITY OF FROST does not add fluoride to its drinking water.
This system has not reported adding fluoride to its water on CDC's My Water's Fluoride listing. Natural fluoride may still be present at trace levels from the source water; the utility's annual water quality report has the latest measured concentration.
Source: CDC My Water's Fluoride, listed under FROST (Navarro County). Verify on CDC's site .
Area context
Navarro County, TX (2020 data)
- Community water systems
- 20 of 22 add fluoride
- Population on fluoridated water
- 46,706 of 55,482 (84.2%)
Texas statewide (2020 data)
- Population on fluoridated water
- 19,743,163 of 27,818,869 (71.0%)
- Community water systems adding fluoride
- 2,573 of 6,046
Data from CDC My Water's Fluoride (per-system status) , last refreshed May 19, 2026.
Data from CDC Water Fluoridation Reporting System (state and county aggregates) , last refreshed May 16, 2026.
Compliance history
EPA-recorded violations against this system over the last 5 years.
How to read this section
Health-based violations are when a measured limit was exceeded; the measured concentration is shown alongside the EPA federal limit where SDWIS published it. Monitoring and reporting items are paperwork issues (missed sample dates, late filings) that do not themselves indicate unsafe water.
2 active health-based violations
EPA records 2 health-based violations that have not yet been resolved.
| Period start | Contaminant | What happened | Measured level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 17, 2024 | Lead and Copper Rule Revisions | LSL Inventory | Not reported | Unaddressed |
| October 17, 2024 | Lead and Copper Rule Revisions | LSL Inventory | Not reported | Unaddressed |
7 monitoring and reporting item s (paperwork) , 3 still open · these are not health risks
| Period start | Relates to | Item | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2025 | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | Unaddressed |
| October 17, 2024 | Lead and Copper Rule Revisions | LSL Reporting | Unaddressed |
| October 17, 2024 | Lead and Copper Rule Revisions | LSL Reporting | Unaddressed |
| September 9, 2021 | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | Resolved |
| September 9, 2021 | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | Resolved |
| June 3, 2021 | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | Resolved |
| June 3, 2021 | Public Notice | Public Notification Violation for NPDWR Violation | Resolved |
68 older violation s (5-10 years ago) · 34 health-based, 34 paperwork , all resolved
| Period start | Relates to | Item | Measured level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.090 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.090 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.090 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.090 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| January 1, 2021 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 30, 2020 | Tthm | Failure Submit IDSE/Subpart V Plan Rpt | — | Resolved |
| October 30, 2020 | Tthm | Failure Submit IDSE/Subpart V Plan Rpt | — | Resolved |
| October 30, 2020 | Tthm | Failure Submit IDSE/Subpart V Plan Rpt | — | Resolved |
| October 30, 2020 | Tthm | Failure Submit IDSE/Subpart V Plan Rpt | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.086 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.086 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.086 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.086 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.086 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.086 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2020 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 10, 2019 | E. Coli | Monitoring, Source Water (GWR) | — | Resolved |
| October 10, 2019 | E. Coli | Monitoring, Source Water (GWR) | — | Resolved |
| October 10, 2019 | E. Coli | Monitoring, Source Water (GWR) | — | Resolved |
| October 10, 2019 | E. Coli | Monitoring, Source Water (GWR) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2018 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2018 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2018 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| January 1, 2018 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| December 1, 2017 | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) | — | Resolved |
| December 1, 2017 | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) | — | Resolved |
| December 1, 2017 | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) | — | Resolved |
| December 1, 2017 | Revised Total Coliform Rule | Monitoring, Routine (RTCR) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.083 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| October 1, 2017 | Chlorine | Monitoring and Reporting (DBP) | — | Resolved |
| July 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.103 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| July 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.103 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| July 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.103 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| July 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.103 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| July 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.103 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| July 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.103 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.084 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.084 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.084 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.084 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.084 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
| April 1, 2017 | Tthm | Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | 0.084 MG/L
MCL 0.080 MG/L | Resolved |
Data from EPA SDWIS (violation records) , last refreshed May 24, 2026.
Where to see every contaminant this utility tested for
EPA's bulk SDWIS dataset gives MyTapWater.us per-system measured values for lead and copper, plus violation records for everything else. To see every regulated contaminant this utility tested for in the past year (TTHMs, HAA5, nitrate, arsenic, fluoride, chromium, etc.) with measured values, read the utility's Consumer Confidence Report (CCR).
Every community water system is required by EPA to publish a CCR annually, by July 1, listing every contaminant they sampled, the measured value, the federal limit, and any health-based exceedances. Most utilities post the report online; some mail it with your bill.
How to find CITY OF FROST's CCR:
- Search the web for "CITY OF FROST consumer confidence report" . The PDF is usually on the utility's own website.
- Or call the utility directly. Their phone number is in the contact section below.
Other water systems in Navarro County, TX
Compare nearby utilities by population served.
- CITY OF CORSICANA
26k served · Navarro County
- RICE WSC
10k served · Navarro County
- CHATFIELD WSC
6,546 served · Navarro County
- M E N WSC
4,040 served · Navarro County
- NAVARRO MILLS WSC
3,852 served · Navarro County
Contact this utility
Public administrative contact information for this water system, as filed with the EPA. Use this to ask about your service line, request your home's lead status, or report a water quality issue.
- Administrator
- DOWDLE, SCOTT
- Phone
- 903-682-3861
- Mailing address
- PO BOX XFROST, TX 76641-0923
Where this page's data comes from
Bundle released 2026-Q2, regenerated May 24, 2026. Each section above also shows its own source date so you can tell at a glance how fresh that part of the page is.
- EPA SDWIS bulk download — last refreshed May 24, 2026 (system info, violations, lead and copper samples).
- CDC My Water's Fluoride — last refreshed May 19, 2026 (per-system Yes/No fluoridation status).
- CDC Water Fluoridation Reporting System — last refreshed May 16, 2026 (state and county fluoridation aggregates).
Every value on this page is cross-verified before publication; read our methodology for the verification steps and corrections process.